![]() |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Frostburg State UniversityFrostburg, Maryland As part of a team under the direction of Kling, the architectural firm completing a campus-wide facilities master plan for the University, Mr. Esposito and Mr. Fellingham assessed the existing 104,773 NASF, 168,732 GSF indoor and outdoor athletic, physical education, and recreation facilities of this Division III university relative to current and planned programs. They reviewed plans of the University for a new 60,000 GSF Recreation Center in light of projected enrollment, campus-wide changes in facility occupancy and function, and the impact on the existing Physical Education Center. Based on our needs assessment, ICAC recommended a renovation of the existing Center and a possible 29,200 NASF, 44,920 GSF building addition with a three-court multi-purpose gymnasia and elevated track to accommodate 10-year planning needs without the construction of the proposed, but not student approved, Recreation Center. In addition, ICAC recommended the demolition of the existing Press Box and construction of one that is ADA compliant and that provides appropriate sight lines and comfortable, weatherized seating for media representatives and University guests.
![]() Frostburg State University Physical Education Complex Mr. Esposito and Dr. Linhart were also responsible for the facilities needs assessment and capital project recommendations for all the remaining academic and administrative units of the University and assisting Kling in completion of the Facilities Master Plan. The existing campus consisted of 42 buildings, 800,216 NASF, 1,319,011 GSF, and their overall facility recommendations called for:
![]() Frostburg State University Athletic Fields Campus Development Issue Rejecting the strategies of leapfrogging-developing the campus in the large, undeveloped portion of the campus-and displacement-relocating the athletic fields to the undeveloped portion of the campus and replacing the vacated space with campus development, the University choose an infill strategy that maintained the pedestrian campus core and identity, reduced parking demand, reduced infrastructure and development costs, and maintained existing athletic field locations. << Back To Projects |
© 2007 | InterCollegiate Athletic Consulting
|