Coppin State
University
Baltimore, Maryland
As part of a team under the direction
of RJE, AIA, the firm completing a campus-wide
facilities master plan for the University that included
Dr. Linhart, Mr. Esposito and Mr. Fellingham assessed
existing indoor and outdoor athletic, physical
education, and recreation facilities of this Division I
university relative to current and planned programs.
Among the recommendations were the demolition of the
current Coppin Center, the physical education facility,
and construction of a new Physical Education Center on
new property that was acquired and which will allow the
University to have much needed athletic and recreation
fields for the campus.
![Coppin State University Map](http://intercollegiateac.com/coppinstatemap.jpg)
In addition to serving as the principal in charge of the
campus master planning process, Mr. Esposito, together
with Dr. Linhart, completed facilities needs assessments
and capital project recommendations for all the
remaining academic and administrative units of the
University and completed the Facilities Master Plan. A
significantly land-locked institution on 38 acres with
10 buildings and no available space for expansion or
surge, Coppin State University had to identify its needs
comprehensively and plan the sequencing of its capital
projects carefully to minimize disruption on campus.
Expansion of Coppin's land holdings on both, north and
south sides of the main campus was an initial priority,
and the opportunities for further land acquisition by
the College must be pursued as they arise. Further, most
of Coppin's facilities and infrastructure were
deficient.
The Facilities Master Plan encompassed and incorporated
three precursor planning efforts for the University.
First it extended the concepts of campus expansion to
the south side of North Avenue presented in the previous
Facilities Master Plan and of the creation of a "front
porch" for the University to strengthen its mission
service ties to the community. It also supported the
fundamental organization of the University campus as
defined in this previous plan. Secondly, it incorporated
the University's response to the goal of the University
System of Maryland that each institution has one program
of national prominence. Third, it reinforced the
recommendations of the Independent Study Team on the
revitalization of the University, of which Mr. Esposito
was a State appointed member, as articulated in the
University's strategic plan. In sum, this Facilities
Master Plan represented a natural progression of Coppin
State University's campus development, founded on
enduring concepts, reinforced through careful, and
thoughtful evaluation of needs and issues, and propelled
by strong conviction to the promise of Coppin's mission.
Overall facility recommendations called for:
- Demolition of 3 buildings-57,897 NASF, 100,827
GSF,
- Construction of 7 buildings-579,225 NASF,
1,044,985 GSF, and
- Renovation of 5 buildings-211,950 NASF, 354,904
GSF,
not including the construction of 2
residence halls and 2 parking structures. Mr. Esposito
developed cost estimates for these capital projects,
including $45.750 million for the proposed Physical
Education Center. With campus-wide utility upgrades,
land acquisition, site improvements, as well as the
preceding facility projects, the ten-year plan was
estimated to cost $356.5 million, with a substantial
amount, $230.0 million, included in projects during the
first five years.
![Coppin State Map Angle](http://intercollegiateac.com/coppinstatemapangle.jpg)
Subsequently, the ICAC team of Mr. Esposito, Mr.
Fellingham, and Dr. Linhart prepared a facilities
program for a new Physical Education Center and outdoor
recreation and athletic fields. The purpose of this Part
1 Facilities Program Justification was to present to the
State of Maryland the need and rationale for the
construction of a new Physical Education Complex
(107,940 NASF, 189,400 GSF) and an Indoor Track facility
(45,500 NASF, 57,000 GSF), relocation of the existing
baseball field, and construction of an outdoor track
with soccer field, tennis courts, and softball field. In
addition to these physical education facilities, parking
for building occupants and visitors was included in the
project.
Following the completion of the Part 1 program, the ICAC
team of Mr. Esposito and Mr. Fellingham completed a Part
2 Specifications document. This document presented the
specifications for each individual space and each of the
proposed functions/programs, as well as the design
guidelines to be used by the architectural and
engineering team for the design and construction of the
facilities. These design guidelines addressed not only
the building but also a complete site plan for
utilities, storm drainage ponds, site development,
signage, and other infrastructure improvements.
The State of Maryland approved the construction of a new
Physical Education Complex including:
- 4 classrooms and 2 class laboratories to support
the Health, Physical Education, Recreation, and
Dance (HPERD) Department programs,
- offices supporting the HPERD and Athletic
Departments,
- shared physical education and intercollegiate
athletic facilities, including:
- main arena with seating for approximately
5,000 and 3 basketball courts,
- 4 racquetball courts, 2 multi-purpose
recreation spaces, and a 2-court auxiliary gym
with storage,
- 8-lane 25-meter competitive pool with
seating for 100,
- dance studio (25 capacity) and fitness
facility (85 capacity),
- general locker/shower rooms (2), and 2
official and 2 visitor locker rooms, general
support facilities, and 4 team rooms to support
the ICA program,
- sports medicine facilities, 10 tables and
rehabilitation area,
- concession and ticket booths,
- 3 lounges, and
- general building storage and central services,
and as outdoor facilities:
- 8 lighted tennis courts,
- baseball field,
- softball field, with synthetic turf outfield,
bleachers, dugouts, fencing, and lighting, and
- 8 lane, 400-meter track with a field events
area, a synthetic turf soccer field, bleachers, and
lighting.
Based on ICAC's initial cost versus
long-term maintenance and operations cost analysis, the
State, for the first time, approved funding for
artificial turf on both the soccer and softball fields.
The State also advised that if the University wanted to
construct the 200-meter Indoor Track facility, it would
have to be funded by private sources. A partnership of
Sasaki and CSD Architects has recently been selected to
design the project.
Mr. Fellingham then subsequently was hired to provide
the equipment list for the entire project. This
"fixtures and fittings" list includes all the office
furniture, athletic and sports medicine equipment,
outdoor facilities' equipment, lighting and spectator
seating, scoreboards, timing devices, lockers, and other
facility and space-related equipment and furnishing
items.
<< Back To Projects
|
|